![]() Meanwhile, a new project maintainer will need to be elected. The Tenacity developer says an investigation into the harassment is currently ongoing, involving both Github and the German federal police. A section of the community, however, appears to have taken more extreme action. The initial reaction was to create a second Audacity fork called Sneedacity, which 4chan users felt was the rightful name, based on the poll. Problems arose, however, after cookiengineer disregarded the results of a poll that was supposed to determine the name of the project, but was swayed by an influx of votes from members of the 4chan community. The privacy policy update proved to be the final straw for many frustrated users, ultimately leading to the creation of Tenacity. This new agreement also stipulated that Muse Group must be given unrestricted rights to all contributions. Later, Muse Group ruffled feathers with a new Contributor License Agreement (CLA) for Audacity (opens in new tab), which contributors were required to sign if they wanted to continue to work on the project. The company put the incident down to an error of communication. Members of the community worried that the tweaks would give the company carte blanche to gather as much user data as they pleased some even went as far as to call Audacity “spyware”.Įver since Muse Group acquired Audacity earlier this year, relations between the company and the open source community have been strained.įirst, the software firm had to backtrack on plans to introduce an option to collect telemetry data after a backlash from contributors. The latest Audacity saga was sparked by changes to the privacy policy made by Muse Group, the new owner. Members of the 4chan community suggest these allegations are not truthful, however, and there is no evidence on the forum to show the developer's address was passed around. Audacity grew in popularity fast thanks to being both free and open-source. Data being collected is not a bad thing, unless is someone we don`t trust, yes you know what I mean, and also is against open-source community, who care about this and they did cared before too, is not something new, that`s why audacity was forked.The developer goes on to claim that the intruders were physically violent as well as verbally abusive, even slitting his arm with an illegal butterfly knife. Since its first release in 2000, Audacity has served as a useful audio editing tool for both Windows and Mac. That`s why people are in fear for the other open-source software being bought too, some of us we just go pro and we encourage as much freedom as it can be, especially me, not necessarily open-source exclusive, but as free as possible. With audacity did not happened like that, it was sold as it is and yes it remained open-source, but it should not have been sold but given free. Once is released as an open-source software with an open-source license, you can only take the source code, change the product into something of your own, as much as possible and then sell it like a commercial product, like Mixxbus being based on Ardour. What is wrong about Audacity being bought by a company is against the open-source freedom. The networking features have been introduced for auto-update checking and automated crash reporting, both of which are disable-able. ![]() No personal data is collected, and your country is kept only for a day. Plus, if you ignore the news and verify the privacy policy yourself, you'll realise it's actually pretty sensible. ![]() MuseGroup's servers are based in the EU, and they also own MuseScore.Īudacity is badly in need of a UI redesign, whether people realise it or not: I had a tech-savvy friend try to record something at it the other day, and he couldn't understand how to find most of the stuff he needed, despite it being logical: Logical != intuitive. Not only is this not true, it seems like these articles are coming dangerously close to click bait. Recently, there’s been some discussion on some open-source websites with provocative headlines that claim Audacity has become spyware. The primary reason big name game companies are investing in Blender is not so that they can collect data, but so that Blender becomes a viable software to develop with. Audacity is a free and open-source multi-track audio editor that I’ve been using ( and talking about) for years. Brandy, what's wrong with Audacity being sold? I understand people are worried, but MuseGroup collects only country (does that clarify as personal data?), and ever since MuseGroup redesigned Blender's interface its popularity has spiked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |